Login to Account Create an Account
New Stadium Pics (NSFW)
#1
Posted August 14, 2011 - 12:42 AM
#2
Posted August 14, 2011 - 03:04 AM
- Marlins and bakerluv77 like this
#3
Posted August 14, 2011 - 03:42 AM
I much prefer Hample to the Happy Youngster.
#4
Posted August 14, 2011 - 04:21 AM
Question: In the pic looking down the street with parking garages on the left and right behind "deeep right field" are there going to be commercial spaces for rent on the ground floors of those garages? I remember hearing about incorporating mixed-use commercial space in an attempt to create a yawkee way or wrigleyville atmosphere. I'm just really, really f***ing tired of seeing boring parking garages...redevelopment boards love em.
#5
Posted August 14, 2011 - 10:55 PM
#6
Posted August 15, 2011 - 01:46 AM
I've seen him around plenty because he comes to Camden Yards a lot; to call him "insufferable" is too kind.
- bakerluv77, Old Timer and NOTtheILMarlins like this
#7
Posted August 15, 2011 - 05:12 AM
It's hard to have an ounce of respect for a grown man in his 30s with no real job who travels around the country on his parents' dollar to act like a total douchebag at ballparks and steal balls from children.
I've seen him around plenty because he comes to Camden Yards a lot; to call him "insufferable" is too kind.
What about the book sales?
#8
Posted August 15, 2011 - 05:44 AM
#9
Posted August 15, 2011 - 05:44 AM
#10
Posted August 15, 2011 - 12:07 PM
Any joker can write a book and get it published, but very few people can rely on it as a source of income.
And he doesn't really do "charitable work." He has people make pledges for the number of balls he snags. It's something that he tacks on in order to try to legitimize what he does. That's not real charity work.
#11
Posted August 15, 2011 - 03:30 PM
As I said Im not a fan either, balls are for kids, but im not going to down the guy for atleast trying to do something good.
#12
Posted August 15, 2011 - 07:51 PM
You are trying to make it sound like he's motivated by some sort of charitable cause. I see no indication that there is any truth to that. He wants to continue to his hobby but he's too embarrassed to be a completely bald 35 year old stealing balls from kids a fraction of his age, so he adds the "pledging" component to try to legitimize it.
This would be like an alcoholic setting up a website saying that he's going to hit the bars and would like donors to pledge X amount of dollars for every shot he takes. In other worlds, he gets to feed his addiction, but it's the other people making the real sacrifice and charitable contributions.
#13
Posted August 15, 2011 - 08:20 PM
#14
Posted August 15, 2011 - 08:29 PM
In those cases, most of the credit still goes to the people actually shelling out the money. However, the people doing the walk are still sacrificing their time and energy, so they have more legitimate motivations and deserve some credit as wellSo people who do the MS Walk or things like that aren't doing something charitable? Same thing. People pledge money to see him do things. Sure it's not as great as just writing a check himself but he is still raising money for charity.
Hample would spend every day hawking balls regardless of the pledges, so he's not really sacrificing anything. It's also hard to interpret his motivations as being altruistic.
The context you describe is different from what Hample does. Please explain to me where Hample is being altruistic and making sacrifices for charity, because I don't see it.
#15
Posted August 15, 2011 - 10:22 PM
#16
Posted August 15, 2011 - 11:24 PM
#17
Posted August 16, 2011 - 12:16 AM
So what is he doing now that he would not be doing without the "charity?"Alright Pen, I normally agree on most things with you, but not on this, and that's fine. Yeah he's not going out there and giving away his own money as far as we know but like I said atleast hes acting like he cared about something in addition to snagging balls even if he don't. Either way people are putting money towards something.
You seem to be conceding that even if he has some "charitable" intentions, he does very little himself. So what are you even trying to argue? I feel like I've made more than a strong enough case as to why he's a douche.
#18
Posted August 16, 2011 - 12:17 AM
Some Mets fan. He wears the opposing team's gear at home games in order to get balls thrown to him.If anything, I think we can all agree he's a douchebag simply for being a Mets fan.
#19
Posted August 16, 2011 - 08:52 AM
I don't think he's a Mets fan. Before he said he is not a fan of any team, he just likes baseball. He goes to a lot of Mets games because he is in NY and apparently the Yankees stadium is very bad for moving around trying to get balls.Some Mets fan. He wears the opposing team's gear at home games in order to get balls thrown to him.
If anything, I think we can all agree he's a douchebag simply for being a Mets fan.
#20
Posted August 16, 2011 - 10:15 AM
So what is he doing now that he would not be doing without the "charity?"
Alright Pen, I normally agree on most things with you, but not on this, and that's fine. Yeah he's not going out there and giving away his own money as far as we know but like I said atleast hes acting like he cared about something in addition to snagging balls even if he don't. Either way people are putting money towards something.
You seem to be conceding that even if he has some "charitable" intentions, he does very little himself. So what are you even trying to argue? I feel like I've made more than a strong enough case as to why he's a douche.
And over and over I have agreed he is a dousch. The whole time I have just been pointing out that atleast something good is coming from it, considering that he could just be.a dick and not even take pledges or what ever. I'm not tryin to convince you that he's not a dousch, you have already made your point that you hate the guy and seem to continue to ignore the point of what I'm trying to say. I'm just saying that there are plenty of other things to down the guy for then atleast makin an effort to do something for charity, however small that effort may be even if your definition of charitable is different then mine.
Call him a dousch for taking balls from kids, wearing other teams gear, stealing balls from the playing field with that glove trick, trespassing...
But not because money is being put to good use.
#21
Posted August 16, 2011 - 06:01 PM
#22
Posted August 16, 2011 - 07:07 PM
Anyone????? anyone know the answer? commercial space? anybody got an idea?I've had the run of the upper deck many times growing up going to games. It was always fun to run around the ghost-town parts of dead center. Even more weird to sit there during our rare post season appearances.
Question: In the pic looking down the street with parking garages on the left and right behind "deeep right field" are there going to be commercial spaces for rent on the ground floors of those garages? I remember hearing about incorporating mixed-use commercial space in an attempt to create a yawkee way or wrigleyville atmosphere. I'm just really, really f***ing tired of seeing boring parking garages...redevelopment boards love em.
#23
Posted August 18, 2011 - 12:13 AM
If I'm a "hater," then so be it. I don't care.Forgive me but it just seems like you hate the man and are trying you best to delegitimize him, Pinguino.He has fun, regardless of how, he makes money for charity. you're coming across as a hater. Which is fine you don't have to like he guy, but it seems like you're obsessing. And if you've ever read his blogs he sometimes gives his balls away and teaches kids how to get their own. It's not like he's selfish.
Obviously I've encountered him in person and think very little of him and think that he should be "deligitimized" from most of the positive press he gets. Conan O'Brien is one of the few people who tried to give him a hard time (despite not blatantly so) and I admire him for that.
It's not an obsession, either. It's mostly confusion as to why someone here who admits that he doesn't like Hample would go to such lengths to try to defend him.
Kids would rather be tossed balls from players and coaches than be handed one from some guy in the stands. If he cared about the kids, he wouldn't be the only guy above 7 years old who darts to the edge of the dugout between innings with a glove in hand to take balls being tossed toward kids. Yes, I've seen him do this.
#24
Posted August 18, 2011 - 12:33 AM
#25
Posted August 18, 2011 - 12:42 AM
You don't think that these kids would prefer finding/catching these balls themselves than having you hand one to them?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users




Sign In
Create Account
This topic is locked
Back to top







