Should probably start getting a bit excited about this kid. He's been consistently efficient since getting called up.
Welcome to MarlinsBaseball.com
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.Login to Account Create an Account
Jacob Turner Thread
Started by dim, Oct 2, 2012 08:04 PM
19 replies to this topic
#1
Posted October 2, 2012 - 08:04 PM
#2
Posted October 2, 2012 - 08:06 PM
He's only had one really bad game since we acquired him. Just needs to work on his location more.
#3
Posted October 2, 2012 - 08:08 PM
Rob Brantly's killing it so far too. Obviously we don't want to get excited like we did over Maybin's September performances, but so far it looks like that was a really good trade.
#4
Posted October 2, 2012 - 08:09 PM
I've enjoyed him thus far.
Would love to see him and Eovaldi become decent-very good front end-mid starters. If Eovaldi can master that change-up and get his control going, that'd be huge.
Would love to see him and Eovaldi become decent-very good front end-mid starters. If Eovaldi can master that change-up and get his control going, that'd be huge.
#5
Posted October 2, 2012 - 08:19 PM
#6
Posted October 2, 2012 - 08:21 PM
#7
Posted October 2, 2012 - 08:23 PM
#8
Posted October 2, 2012 - 08:24 PM
#9
Posted October 2, 2012 - 08:24 PM
Bell decided he didn't want Turner to get the win tonight. Dunn didn't help much either.
I'd be very content if I never saw any of them in a Marlins uniform ever again.
I'd be very content if I never saw any of them in a Marlins uniform ever again.
#10
Posted October 2, 2012 - 08:25 PM
We've blown quite a few games for Turner and Eovaldi lately. Both guys have pitched very well.
I also like how I see Turner's velocity getting better considering he was supposed to have a mid 90's fastball.
I also like how I see Turner's velocity getting better considering he was supposed to have a mid 90's fastball.
#11
Posted October 2, 2012 - 08:26 PM
#12
Posted October 2, 2012 - 09:00 PM
Hopefully they don't ruin these guys. We've seen guys with tremendous velocity come to this organization only to have it discouraged for more control.
#13
Posted October 2, 2012 - 09:04 PM
#14
Posted October 2, 2012 - 09:07 PM
#15
Posted October 2, 2012 - 10:48 PM
#16
Posted October 2, 2012 - 11:33 PM
Nolasco's best statistical season = a 1.78 BB/9, 91.2 average FB velocity.
This year, 2.21 BB/9, 90 average FB velocity.
I don't think this is a case of sacrificing velocity for more control, considering Nolasco's strength has always been control.
If anything, he might've become more of a pitch to contact guy because he wasn't putting up good ERA's. His velocity drop mainly began last year and it resulted in more GB's/less HR's. So maybe there's that, but it wasn't for more control.
Nolasco never has put up good results, ERA-wise, with the exception of the 2008 season.
This year, 2.21 BB/9, 90 average FB velocity.
I don't think this is a case of sacrificing velocity for more control, considering Nolasco's strength has always been control.
If anything, he might've become more of a pitch to contact guy because he wasn't putting up good ERA's. His velocity drop mainly began last year and it resulted in more GB's/less HR's. So maybe there's that, but it wasn't for more control.
Nolasco never has put up good results, ERA-wise, with the exception of the 2008 season.
#17
Posted October 3, 2012 - 01:12 AM
I thought he was going along the lines of Josh Johnson, in which case that still doesn't add up at all.
#18
Posted October 3, 2012 - 04:33 AM
Trader Jack used to say that when it comes in at 98, it goes out at 108. There is something to be said for taking some off your FB, especially if you get better movement on it or better control on it at a little slower speed. Also mixing up the speed of your fastball (or any pitch) will have the hitters confused more. Basically it's called pitching, not just throwing. That said, mixing up the speed of your FB instead of just hurling it as hard as you can every time, will bring the average of it down some. IOW, silly stat.
#19
Posted October 3, 2012 - 11:56 AM
I'm with you, Sir Bob, on changing of speeds on the fastball. Bust em hard in and go a little softer away [even just a difference of 3-4 mph] could be a big thing for a lot of pitchers, and something that they don't use.
Same with breaking pitches, too. A lot to be said about speed mixes.
Same with breaking pitches, too. A lot to be said about speed mixes.
#20
Posted October 3, 2012 - 12:38 PM
Trader Jack used to say that when it comes in at 98, it goes out at 108.
I assume you're talking about control of the fastball at higher velocities?
Otherwise, physics disagrees.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users




Sign In
Create Account
Back to top









