Login to Account Create an Account
Should Marlins look at A-Rod?
#1
Posted October 12, 2012 - 12:54 PM
#2
Posted October 12, 2012 - 12:56 PM
#3
Posted October 12, 2012 - 01:11 PM
#4
Posted October 12, 2012 - 01:18 PM
#5
Posted October 12, 2012 - 01:35 PM
#6
Posted October 12, 2012 - 01:36 PM
#7
Posted October 12, 2012 - 01:41 PM
#8
Posted October 12, 2012 - 01:41 PM
#9
Posted October 12, 2012 - 01:42 PM
if they pay a huge portion of his contract and take on heath bell, deal. He would be a great fit in the lineup in every way except for his contract.
I'm pretty sure we'd have to pay all of his contract just because we throw in Bell.
#10
Posted October 12, 2012 - 01:44 PM
Edit: I would also like my choice of supercar and Vivid girl each year of the contract.
#11
Posted October 12, 2012 - 01:53 PM
#12
Posted October 12, 2012 - 01:55 PM
#13
Posted October 12, 2012 - 01:55 PM
Thank you! I hate it when people do that.
Misleading thread title. Someone change it please.
Fixed
#14
Posted October 12, 2012 - 02:04 PM
#15
Posted October 12, 2012 - 02:05 PM
#16
Posted October 12, 2012 - 02:07 PM
Then again, we may be saying the same about Albert in about 5-6 years.
#17
Posted October 12, 2012 - 02:08 PM
#18
Posted October 12, 2012 - 02:08 PM
What?I am going to proceed in behalf of the Marlins and give the Yankees Nolasco and Bell for Arod. Even salary trade (20M), Yankees throw in some mone to offset 2nd and 3rd year of remaining contract (negotiable). Win-win situation.
#19
Posted October 12, 2012 - 02:10 PM
No matter how good a player is in his prime, I'd always be reluctant to offer him anything close to $20 million per season after the age of 35. The Marlins dodged a huge bullet with Pujols.Sucks that a guy who's declining so badly is going to be owed over a hundy mill.
Then again, we may be saying the same about Albert in about 5-6 years.
#20
Posted October 12, 2012 - 02:12 PM
#21
Posted October 12, 2012 - 02:13 PM
I agree.No matter how good a player is in his prime, I'd always be reluctant to offer him anything close to $20 million per season after the age of 35. The Marlins dodged a huge bullet with Pujols.
Sucks that a guy who's declining so badly is going to be owed over a hundy mill.
Then again, we may be saying the same about Albert in about 5-6 years.
However, if we signed him and maybe frontloaded the contract ... but then again, that's not really how the Marlins [or anyone else really] do business.
#22
Posted October 12, 2012 - 02:14 PM
#23
Posted October 14, 2012 - 11:26 AM
No matter how good a player is in his prime, I'd always be reluctant to offer him anything close to $20 million per season after the age of 35. The Marlins dodged a huge bullet with Pujols.
Sucks that a guy who's declining so badly is going to be owed over a hundy mill.
Then again, we may be saying the same about Albert in about 5-6 years.
I'd be reluctant. The only thing that would make me be okay with it would be to know that with that contract, your team can have a run multiple World Series early in it (and win some..).
I think that for the Yankees, it was okay and it turned out okay.
I don't think a contract like that would benefit the Marlins, I agree. Pujols = bullet dodged.
The only thing I think is sad about A-Rod right now is that he's falling off the table for a chance at taking that #1 spot from Barry Bonds.
#24
Posted October 14, 2012 - 06:19 PM
The Yankees are also arguably in a different situation than most teams, too. Their revenue stream is probably unmatched so they are able to absorb these mistakes in a way that any other team cannot.
#25
Posted October 14, 2012 - 07:14 PM
[The Yankees'] revenue stream is probably unmatched so they are able to absorb these mistakes in a way that any other team cannot.
Pavano, for instance. They hardly noticed the 40 million they wasted on 145 innings from him.
Where else could you get paid $17,600 per pitch, have no net effect (9 total wins in 4 years) on the team and they pat you on the back and wish you well in your future endeavors as you leave -- as they scratch their heads and wonder who the hell you are because they've already forgotten your name?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users




Sign In
Create Account
Back to top









