The Royals claimed catcher Brett Hayes off of waivers from the Marlins, Bob Dutton of the Kansas City Star reports (on Twitter).
Read more at http://www.mlbtrader...ZY5HIKGX8cis.99
Welcome to MarlinsBaseball.com
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.Login to Account Create an Account
He Gone: Brett Hayes
Started by Piazza31, Nov 2, 2012 01:56 PM
20 replies to this topic
#1
Posted November 2, 2012 - 01:56 PM
#2
Posted November 2, 2012 - 01:59 PM
#3
Posted November 2, 2012 - 02:22 PM
#4
Posted November 2, 2012 - 02:31 PM
#5
Posted November 2, 2012 - 02:34 PM
#6
Posted November 2, 2012 - 02:46 PM
#7
Posted November 2, 2012 - 04:02 PM
#8
Posted November 2, 2012 - 04:22 PM
#9
Posted November 2, 2012 - 04:23 PM
I was hoping someone would get that.
K.
That's what he does, yes.
Both my indifference to this news and what he does.
#10
Posted November 3, 2012 - 05:48 AM
#11
Posted November 3, 2012 - 08:21 AM
#12
Posted November 3, 2012 - 08:37 AM
Gee, what a surprise. Looks like so far Buck is the back up catcher next year.
He better be for $6 million.
#13
Posted November 3, 2012 - 12:05 PM
Nobody is exactly HAPPY to see him gone, but at the same time, logically speaking, it's okay.
It must be the John Buck factor.
It must be the John Buck factor.
#14
Posted November 3, 2012 - 12:45 PM
I'd much rather have Buck than Hayes.Gee, what a surprise. Looks like so far Buck is the back up catcher next year.
I'd rather have 6 Buck's before Hayes.
#15
Posted November 3, 2012 - 05:47 PM
#16
Posted November 3, 2012 - 07:07 PM
#17
Posted November 3, 2012 - 07:19 PM
#18
Posted November 3, 2012 - 11:58 PM
#19
Posted November 4, 2012 - 05:42 AM
I'd much rather have Buck than Hayes.
Gee, what a surprise. Looks like so far Buck is the back up catcher next year.
I'd rather have 6 Buck's before Hayes.
I agree. Nothing wrong here. And he didn't seem to have a problem helping with the developement of the kid. I think it could be a very well spent $6 mil if he is here for the full year. However, I think he starts the year here, but gets traded before the July deadline. I think Red will take the kid under his wing. And again, nothing wrong with that.
#20
Posted November 4, 2012 - 05:46 AM
Gee, what a surprise. Looks like so far Buck is the back up catcher next year.
He better be for $6 million.
Guess I should have said back up catcher/teacher. The way I see it, one is making minimum wage and one is making $6 mil. I really don't care which is which.
#21
Posted November 4, 2012 - 08:13 AM
6 bucks? I'd be happy with a quarter.I'd much rather have Buck than Hayes.
Gee, what a surprise. Looks like so far Buck is the back up catcher next year.
I'd rather have 6 Buck's before Hayes.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users




Sign In
Create Account
Back to top









