Jump to content

Sky Slate Blueberry Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Teal Apple Emerald Chocolate
Welcome to MarlinsBaseball.com
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account
Photo

Winter Meetings Rumors


  • Please log in to reply
323 replies to this topic

#1
mchaps55

mchaps55

    Muckdog

  • Guppy
  • 7 posts

Jim Bowden epsn.com just wrote up a column that listed 5 predictions for baseball winter meetings. Marlins came in at #3. I have zero faith in this but who else is left to sign that would need a no trade clause. Bourn makes zero sense and I doubt any of the big guys would come here even if a no trade clause was in place.


3. The Miami Marlins will sign a free agent and give him a full-no trade clause

The Marlins’ trades of Buehrle, Reyes and Bell this offseason have left agents with such a bad taste in their mouths that many of them are saying they won’t even talk to the Marlins on behalf of their clients. Interestingly, a year ago, the Marlins all but had Albert Pujols signed, but their refusal to include a no-trade clause allowed him to make the right choice and sign with the Angels. If he had signed with the Marlins, he probably would be with the Toronto Blue Jays today. The Marlins are under scrutiny from the commissioner’s office and the players' association to spend rather than pocketing what look to be significant revenue-sharing gains the next few years. The Marlins need to step up and surprise baseball by adding a significant free agent and will have no choice this time but to change their policy and give a full no-trade clause so players they sign won’t have to worry about being dealt in a year.



#2
Dr Beinfest

Dr Beinfest

    Larry's Little Helper

  • Supporter
  • 12,018 posts
  • Location:Orlando, FL
  • Gender:Male
A league minimum with an NTC, yes.

#3
yokofox33

yokofox33

    lol desu

  • Members
  • 4,194 posts
  • Location:Hollywood, FL
  • Gender:Male
1-year deal. NTC.

#4
hovertical

hovertical

    Hammerhead

  • Members
  • 464 posts
  • Gender:Male
Wes Helms with a full NTC

#5
BenderRobot

BenderRobot

    Srsly

  • Moderators
  • 32,988 posts
  • Location:Florida
  • Gender:Male
We have done NTC's before [only one I can think of, Javier Vazquez] on a one-year deal, so I'd say that could happen.

#6
el penguino

el penguino

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • 24,965 posts
  • Location:Charm City
  • Gender:Male
That's really dumb. There's no reason to give a full no-trade clause to set an example.

Three years from now if they want to sign someone without a clause, the player will damn well know that there's a likely chance that he's traded before the contract is up.

In the future, the only players who "won't have to worry" are those who have no-trade clause protection.

#7
Erick

Erick

    Hall of Famer

  • Supporter
  • 22,910 posts
  • Gender:Male
Yeah, I hope this doesn't happen.

#8
Dr Beinfest

Dr Beinfest

    Larry's Little Helper

  • Supporter
  • 12,018 posts
  • Location:Orlando, FL
  • Gender:Male
I don't mind it as a publicity stunt.

#9
poptart

poptart

    Hungover

  • Members
  • 6,750 posts
  • Location:Jacksonville
  • Gender:Male
extend Keppinger for 5 years. NTC.

#10
Piazza31

Piazza31

    Pr*ck

  • Members
  • 3,677 posts
  • Location:Miami, FL
  • Gender:Male
I'm okay and hope there's a splash. Who remains to be seen,

Josh Hamiltons insistence on a 5 year or more deal may get a deal done with Miami without a NTC.

#11
SilverBullet1929

SilverBullet1929

    Rookie

  • Members
  • 2,711 posts
  • Location:Miami, Florida
  • Gender:Male
All other factors aside, why would Hamilton want to come here based on the fact that we are now clearly rebuilding? Three weeks ago I'd have at least mildly entertained the Hamilton idea so he could join Reyes and Stanton. Not now.

#12
Piazza31

Piazza31

    Pr*ck

  • Members
  • 3,677 posts
  • Location:Miami, FL
  • Gender:Male

All other factors aside, why would Hamilton want to come here based on the fact that we are now clearly rebuilding? Three weeks ago I'd have at least mildly entertained the Hamilton idea so he could join Reyes and Stanton. Not now.


Same reason why every player signed here last year without a NTC...

We offer the most money and most years. Exactly why Reyes choose Miami, why Buerhle did and why Bell did.

Even Pujols almost signed here until the Angels gave him more money and a NTC

#13
squall

squall

    pwner

  • Supporter
  • 6,921 posts
  • Location:miami, fl
  • Gender:Male
I don't think they make a big signing.

#14
Entendu101

Entendu101

    sXe

  • Members
  • 4,890 posts
  • Location:Miami, Florida
  • Gender:Male
That would be a terrible waste of money. For that, you keep Reyes..

Even if the goal was to sign a guy so that he can be part of a core that's still forming, you absolutely cannot pick someone as old as Hamilton. Again, you would've kept Reyes.

#15
EricWiener

EricWiener

    Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,610 posts
  • Location:Fort Lauderdale, FL
And, if Reyes was the price paid to unload the sh*t contracts, then you get somebody reasonably young and likely to last for 5+ seasons at a top level. And this FA class is really short on that kind of player.

#16
hovertical

hovertical

    Hammerhead

  • Members
  • 464 posts
  • Gender:Male
I'd like to see Jurgens given a deal if he'd actually sign here....depends on the terms but he wouldn't be a bad guy to have in the starting rotation....i could see the fish taking a flyer on Wilson too if they could get him cheaply

#17
el penguino

el penguino

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • 24,965 posts
  • Location:Charm City
  • Gender:Male

That would be a terrible waste of money. For that, you keep Reyes..

Even if the goal was to sign a guy so that he can be part of a core that's still forming, you absolutely cannot pick someone as old as Hamilton. Again, you would've kept Reyes.

Exactly. Signing Hamilton makes absolutely zero sense. If the Marlins want to have that much money on the books right now when they are rebuilding, they would have kept Reyes.

#18
mystikol87

mystikol87

    All Star

  • Supporter
  • 10,648 posts
  • Location:Durham, NC
  • Gender:Male
My prediction: Jim Bowden is still dumb.

#19
Entendu101

Entendu101

    sXe

  • Members
  • 4,890 posts
  • Location:Miami, Florida
  • Gender:Male
I think the Marlins were showcasing Escobar as their 3B to let everyone know that he is willing to play 3B at the Winter Meetings. There's a thin 3B market and contenders will probably pay for someone on the higher end, like Escobar. Then I bet the Marlins sign someone like Reynolds for a year or two to hold it down until we're in a position to contend.

#20
SilverBullet1929

SilverBullet1929

    Rookie

  • Members
  • 2,711 posts
  • Location:Miami, Florida
  • Gender:Male


All other factors aside, why would Hamilton want to come here based on the fact that we are now clearly rebuilding? Three weeks ago I'd have at least mildly entertained the Hamilton idea so he could join Reyes and Stanton. Not now.


Same reason why every player signed here last year without a NTC...

We offer the most money and most years. Exactly why Reyes choose Miami, why Buerhle did and why Bell did.

Even Pujols almost signed here until the Angels gave him more money and a NTC


agreed, and since we're rebuilding I don't think we offer the most money or years to any free agent. Thus it goes back to square one, we aren't getting Hamilton unless he actually wanted to come here and money wasn't an option. Though that's not the case so again, no Hamilton in Miami.

Actually its almost silly to entertain this thought at this point.

#21
mystikol87

mystikol87

    All Star

  • Supporter
  • 10,648 posts
  • Location:Durham, NC
  • Gender:Male

I think the Marlins were showcasing Escobar as their 3B to let everyone know that he is willing to play 3B at the Winter Meetings. There's a thin 3B market and contenders will probably pay for someone on the higher end, like Escobar. Then I bet the Marlins sign someone like Reynolds for a year or two to hold it down until we're in a position to contend.

I don't know if that's true, but it's definitely an interesting thought.

#22
Entendu101

Entendu101

    sXe

  • Members
  • 4,890 posts
  • Location:Miami, Florida
  • Gender:Male


I think the Marlins were showcasing Escobar as their 3B to let everyone know that he is willing to play 3B at the Winter Meetings. There's a thin 3B market and contenders will probably pay for someone on the higher end, like Escobar. Then I bet the Marlins sign someone like Reynolds for a year or two to hold it down until we're in a position to contend.

I don't know if that's true, but it's definitely an interesting thought.


I think it's the best case scenario for the future of the team... well, besides us keeping him, him having a monster first half, then trading him away at the trade deadline to a desperate contender and raking in a sh*tload.

#23
Larry

Larry

    The Head Fish

  • Admin
  • 46,809 posts
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY
  • Gender:Male

I don't think they make a big signing.


Exactly and I don't think they should anyway.

Loria isn't even making the trip to Nashville unlike last year's meetings when he was on the grand stage.

#24
squall

squall

    pwner

  • Supporter
  • 6,921 posts
  • Location:miami, fl
  • Gender:Male


I don't think they make a big signing.


Exactly and I don't think they should anyway.

Loria isn't even making the trip to Nashville unlike last year's meetings when he was on the grand stage.

Yeah. In a few years when these prospects hopefully develop and become good/decent then sign a couple big FA to fill holes and compete.

#25
Dr Beinfest

Dr Beinfest

    Larry's Little Helper

  • Supporter
  • 12,018 posts
  • Location:Orlando, FL
  • Gender:Male
and repeat cycle.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users