Jump to content

Sky Slate Blueberry Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Teal Apple Emerald Chocolate
Welcome to MarlinsBaseball.com
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account
Photo

Something Positive About the 2013 Roster!


  • Please log in to reply
99 replies to this topic

#1
pierremvp1

pierremvp1

    Negotiator In Chief

  • Members
  • 6,106 posts
  • Location:Broward
  • Gender:Male
For me, it's going to contain my 2 favorite players to watch play the game.
Stanton for obvious reasons and Pierre because I have fun watching him have fun, and though he's not HOF caliber, his work ethic and enjoyment with the game has led to a productive career, which looks better and better as he's able to do it with age, considering it's based on speed.

#2
anotherrealfan

anotherrealfan

    Zephyr

  • Members
  • 1,805 posts
  • Location:Aventura

This versus other teams that have 9 favorite players every night.  Remember how boring the last 2 months of the season was when we couldn't hit, score runs or produce anything resembling good baseball.



#3
hovertical

hovertical

    Hammerhead

  • Members
  • 454 posts
  • Gender:Male

i agree that the team was extremely painful to watch starting around the time hanley was traded....it was the most painful season i've ever seen...at least during the post 97 firesale they weren't that anemic on offense...the games are tiny bit more tolerable if the team has a chance to actually score runs...but when scoring 3 runs is considered a good night the team just becomes a bore to watch. 

 

can't really say much about the team heading into next season since it'll be laden with unprovens...Lomo moving to first and returning to form would be a massive boost to the offense along with pierre actually getting on base.



#4
squall

squall

    pwner

  • Supporter
  • 6,820 posts
  • Location:miami, fl
  • Gender:Male
The next season is going to be great for nostalgia. I enjoyed being single and now I get to watch a whole season of singles being hit.

#5
el penguino

el penguino

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • 24,775 posts
  • Location:Charm City
  • Gender:Male

One positive is that the 2013 roster might play poorly enough that it nets a decent draft pick.  Unfortunately since the pick will be drafted by Beinfest, he is certain to be a bust no matter how highly regarded the player is.



#6
Erick

Erick

    Hall of Famer

  • Supporter
  • 22,758 posts
  • Gender:Male
It's not the 2012 team.

#7
anotherrealfan

anotherrealfan

    Zephyr

  • Members
  • 1,805 posts
  • Location:Aventura

It's not the 2012 team.

This goes well in the slogan thread



#8
Puma

Puma

    Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,200 posts
  • Location:Tallahassee/West Palm Beach, FL
  • Gender:Male

It's not the 2012 team.


You're right. It's worse.

#9
Erick

Erick

    Hall of Famer

  • Supporter
  • 22,758 posts
  • Gender:Male

They could win less and it still wouldn't be worse than that piece of s***, overrated roster that set this franchise back some years. 



#10
Puma

Puma

    Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,200 posts
  • Location:Tallahassee/West Palm Beach, FL
  • Gender:Male

They could win less and it still wouldn't be worse than that piece of s***, overrated roster that set this franchise back some years. 


The thing that set the franchise back for years is the fact that its owned and managed by incompetent douche bags.

#11
Erick

Erick

    Hall of Famer

  • Supporter
  • 22,758 posts
  • Gender:Male

Incompetent douchebags who overpaid for the overrated roster that was the 2012 team. Not only did they suck on the field, they were annoying off of it. Easily the least likable Marlins team of all-time. 

 

If we're going to suck, I would rather suck this way. 

 

Trading the overrated 2012 roster was the best thing the front office has done in years. 



#12
Puma

Puma

    Veteran

  • Members
  • 5,200 posts
  • Location:Tallahassee/West Palm Beach, FL
  • Gender:Male
At what cost though? They pissed off the fan base, pissed off the face of the franchise, and killed any chance of a serious free agent signing in Miami for a long time.

Trading Bell and firing Ozzie would have been enough. Everything else was just a salary dump so Loria could have more money in his pockets.

#13
squall

squall

    pwner

  • Supporter
  • 6,820 posts
  • Location:miami, fl
  • Gender:Male

Incompetent douchebags who overpaid for the overrated roster that was the 2012 team. Not only did they suck on the field, they were annoying off of it. Easily the least likable Marlins team of all-time. 

 

If we're going to suck, I would rather suck this way. 

 

Trading the overrated 2012 roster was the best thing the front office has done in years. 

2012 roster was overpaid but they under performed. Who predicted this? No one. The only annoying off the field person was Bell. Maybe Ozzie but he was surprisingly quiet.

 

Sucking is sucking. I would rather suck with a high payroll and fun to watch players. Same result, more entertainment. I'm not financially invested in the marlins so I don't give a s*** if Loria loses money. Now we get to watch a bunch of s*** prospects suck for a year or two, come up short in their development, watch stanton get traded, and then rely on high draft picks which will probably be busts anyways because the s*** FO is still intact. 



#14
Erick

Erick

    Hall of Famer

  • Supporter
  • 22,758 posts
  • Gender:Male

 

Incompetent douchebags who overpaid for the overrated roster that was the 2012 team. Not only did they suck on the field, they were annoying off of it. Easily the least likable Marlins team of all-time. 

 

If we're going to suck, I would rather suck this way. 

 

Trading the overrated 2012 roster was the best thing the front office has done in years. 

2012 roster was overpaid but they under performed. Who predicted this? No one. The only annoying off the field person was Bell. Maybe Ozzie but he was surprisingly quiet.

 

Sucking is sucking. I would rather suck with a high payroll and fun to watch players. Same result, more entertainment. I'm not financially invested in the marlins so I don't give a s*** if Loria loses money. Now we get to watch a bunch of s*** prospects suck for a year or two, come up short in their development, watch stanton get traded, and then rely on high draft picks which will probably be busts anyways because the s*** FO is still intact. 

 

 

Overpaying players for bad results leads to consistent mediocrity because you suck and you have limited flexibility to make moves to improve.

 

Maybe you should become a Cubs fan. They'd probably be more fun for you. 

 

Also, your form of entertainment is rather odd. Watching paint dry was more entertaining than watching the 2012 Marlins. 



#15
el penguino

el penguino

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • 24,775 posts
  • Location:Charm City
  • Gender:Male

Incompetent douchebags who overpaid for the overrated roster that was the 2012 team. Not only did they suck on the field, they were annoying off of it. Easily the least likable Marlins team of all-time. 

 

If we're going to suck, I would rather suck this way. 

 

Trading the overrated 2012 roster was the best thing the front office has done in years. 

Did you think that the 2012 team was sh*tty and overrated before the season started?



#16
Erick

Erick

    Hall of Famer

  • Supporter
  • 22,758 posts
  • Gender:Male

They also didn't underperform; they were just garbage. 



#17
Erick

Erick

    Hall of Famer

  • Supporter
  • 22,758 posts
  • Gender:Male

 

Incompetent douchebags who overpaid for the overrated roster that was the 2012 team. Not only did they suck on the field, they were annoying off of it. Easily the least likable Marlins team of all-time. 

 

If we're going to suck, I would rather suck this way. 

 

Trading the overrated 2012 roster was the best thing the front office has done in years. 

Did you think that the 2012 team was sh*tty and overrated before the season started?

 

I didn't think they'd make the playoffs. I thought they would finish in 3rd place.

 

I also don't think that makes a difference. For example, before 2012 everyone was hoping Hanley would rebound. After a couple of years of the same thing, it's now safe to assume that Hanley might just be mediocre now. Hanley was a big part of that team. 

 

The rest of the big signings basically played up to career norms with the exception of Bell.

 

The team didn't really underachieve. They had a bunch of players who have clearly regressed and, thus, are now overpaid. 

Who underachieved? 



#18
el penguino

el penguino

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • 24,775 posts
  • Location:Charm City
  • Gender:Male

I, for one, didn't expect Hanley to rebound.  I do seem to recall that most people had higher expectations for the rotation (part of that was that a lot of people were acting like Josh Johnson was still going to be one of the best pitchers in baseball even after his injury).  And people seemed optimistic that Nolasco would "live up to his peripherals" (which always makes me LOL).

 

I think that people were expecting more out of Hanley, Morrison, Buck, Zambrano, Bell, and maybe even Reyes (his final line was close to his career numbers, but he still had a .100 OPS drop from the 2011 season and his defense seemed to regress).

 

For what it's worth, I predicted that the Marlins would finish in 4th place in 2012.  I won't pat myself on the back, though, because I expected the Phillies to be good.



#19
Entendu101

Entendu101

    sXe

  • Members
  • 4,761 posts
  • Location:Miami, Florida
  • Gender:Male

Incompetent douchebags who overpaid for the overrated roster that was the 2012 team. Not only did they suck on the field, they were annoying off of it. Easily the least likable Marlins team of all-time. 

 

If we're going to suck, I would rather suck this way. 

 

Trading the overrated 2012 roster was the best thing the front office has done in years. 

 

Why were they easily the least likable Marlins team of all-time?



#20
squall

squall

    pwner

  • Supporter
  • 6,820 posts
  • Location:miami, fl
  • Gender:Male

 

Incompetent douchebags who overpaid for the overrated roster that was the 2012 team. Not only did they suck on the field, they were annoying off of it. Easily the least likable Marlins team of all-time. 

 

If we're going to suck, I would rather suck this way. 

 

Trading the overrated 2012 roster was the best thing the front office has done in years. 

 

Why were they easily the least likable Marlins team of all-time?

 

Because he didn't like them. 



#21
dim

dim

    President of the Robert Andino Fan Club.

  • Members
  • 15,716 posts
  • Location:Coral Springs
  • Gender:Male

The least likeable Marlins team I can remember was '05. Hell, that team was similar to the '12 team, up and including the part where AJ Burnett got kicked off the team for criticizing management.

 

So basically we've learned that for the Marlins, when the going gets tough, fire sale.



#22
Anonymous

Anonymous

    All Star

  • Members
  • 12,068 posts
  • Gender:Male
Trading away Johnson, Ramirez, and Sanchez was the right move. But trading away Buehrle and Reyes bothers me. They could have kept them and built from there. They didn't have to literally blow it up and stay pat in FA.

#23
EricWiener

EricWiener

    Veteran

  • Members
  • 6,610 posts
  • Location:Fort Lauderdale, FL

This versus other teams that have 9 favorite players every night.  Remember how boring the last 2 months of the season was when we couldn't hit, score runs or produce anything resembling good baseball.

 

The 2003 championship team did not have 9 starters we liked.



#24
Erick

Erick

    Hall of Famer

  • Supporter
  • 22,758 posts
  • Gender:Male

 

Incompetent douchebags who overpaid for the overrated roster that was the 2012 team. Not only did they suck on the field, they were annoying off of it. Easily the least likable Marlins team of all-time. 

 

If we're going to suck, I would rather suck this way. 

 

Trading the overrated 2012 roster was the best thing the front office has done in years. 

 

Why were they easily the least likable Marlins team of all-time?

 

Well, in my opinion, anyway. You're entitled to yours. 



#25
Erick

Erick

    Hall of Famer

  • Supporter
  • 22,758 posts
  • Gender:Male

Trading away Johnson, Ramirez, and Sanchez was the right move. But trading away Buehrle and Reyes bothers me. They could have kept them and built from there. They didn't have to literally blow it up and stay pat in FA.

Buehrle's contract was bad; I'm glad he's no longer here. 

I liked Reyes but I guess there's no point in having him and his contract if the rest of the team is going to suck anyway. 






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users