Jump to content

Sky Slate Blueberry Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Teal Apple Emerald Chocolate
Welcome to MarlinsBaseball.com
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account
Photo

Attendance for the 2013 season


  • Please log in to reply
89 replies to this topic

#1
hotdog

hotdog

    Muckdog

  • Members
  • 16 posts

I feel that if we attend the fewest games possible a positive change will come. I think we should hit Loria where it hurts, his pockets. Can you imagine how terrible the front office will feel if they have a super low attendance on Opening Day



#2
Larry

Larry

    The Head Fish

  • Admin
  • 46,785 posts
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY
  • Gender:Male
Low attendance is part of the reason for the slash in payroll. Fans didn't show up in droves when the Marlins had a high payroll anyway.

#3
Jokersgoon

Jokersgoon

    Squall's Bench Coach

  • Members
  • 2,104 posts
  • Location:Hialeah
  • Gender:Male
Low attendance is part of the reason for the slash in payroll. Fans didn't show up in droves when the Marlins had a high payroll anyway.

What he said...



#4
Erick

Erick

    Hall of Famer

  • Supporter
  • 22,776 posts
  • Gender:Male
I feel that if we attend the fewest games possible a positive change will come. I think we should hit Loria where it hurts, his pockets. Can you imagine how terrible the front office will feel if they have a super low attendance on Opening Day

 

I'm guessing they probably wouldn't care. 



#5
FishFan88

FishFan88

    Sun

  • Members
  • 700 posts
  • Gender:Male
I have a feeling people didn't show up because we stank like a box of dirty socks

#6
pierremvp1

pierremvp1

    Negotiator In Chief

  • Members
  • 6,106 posts
  • Location:Broward
  • Gender:Male
I think that attendance in 2013 will do better than expected at the moment. The franchise still has a destination stadium to market, plus Giancarlo Stanton and ummmm.....did I mention the stadium? Let's see how they market it. If I was involved in marketing in this situation I'd do my best to work from the bottom-up, and I don't mean the Clevelander, though I'd market that too as long as they stay open. In this town, if there's 5000 fan asses in seats in the bleachers(and in this place the worst seat is good)...that makes the more desirable seats more valuable. They do need to at least keep and even better for attendance sign Stanton asap.

#7
marlinsno1

marlinsno1

    Hammerhead

  • Members
  • 296 posts
  • Location:Boynton Beach, FL
  • Gender:Male
I have a feeling people didn't show up because we stank like a box of dirty socks

 

This.



#8
BeasleyJay

BeasleyJay

    Muckdog

  • Members
  • 14 posts
  • Location:Miami, FL
  • Gender:Male
Well im going to the game with 2 dollar tickets on StubHub. So im ok.

#9
FutureGM

FutureGM

    All Star

  • Members
  • 11,933 posts
  • Location:Orlando, FL
  • Gender:Male
Low attendance is part of the reason for the slash in payroll. Fans didn't show up in droves when the Marlins had a high payroll anyway.

You don't gut a team after 3 months and then whine that nobody showed up. The fans are just a convienient scapegoat in this situation for Loria and Samson.

 

I would also add that it doesn't matter what the attendance is. Loria is going to bring in something like $60 million even before gate receipts thanks to revenue sharing and the new MLB TV deal that all teams are getting a cut of.



#10
Larry

Larry

    The Head Fish

  • Admin
  • 46,785 posts
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY
  • Gender:Male

The fans weren't showing up in masses before the trades.



#11
squall

squall

    pwner

  • Supporter
  • 6,829 posts
  • Location:miami, fl
  • Gender:Male
The fans weren't showing up in masses before the trades.
It doesn't matter. The difference in attendance and max capacity wasn't significant, especially in the first 3 months. Its a bs excuse.

#12
el penguino

el penguino

    Hall of Famer

  • Members
  • 24,780 posts
  • Location:Charm City
  • Gender:Male
The fans weren't showing up in masses before the trades.
It doesn't matter. The difference in attendance and max capacity wasn't significant, especially in the first 3 months. Its a bs excuse.

I don't think that anybody is saying that the team was gutted mid-season because of attendance.

 

Anyway, by the end of May their record was 29-22.  They were drawing like 30,000 or so on the weekends and 24,000 in the middle of the week.  I'd say that difference is significant.  The Marlins weren't drawing well when the team was doing well.



#13
Larry

Larry

    The Head Fish

  • Admin
  • 46,785 posts
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY
  • Gender:Male

Attendance was definitely not the reason for the mid-season deals.  Trades were made because the front office (rightfully) decided that roster wasn't going to be playoff bound.  Besides, holding onto Anibal Sanchez would've been a big mistake as we found out with his new contract terms.  



#14
Wild Card

Wild Card

    Big Ears, Big Future

  • Members
  • 16,866 posts
  • Location:Coconut Creek, Florida
  • Gender:Male
Attendance was definitely not the reason for the mid-season deals. Trades were made because the front office (rightfully) decided that roster wasn't going to be playoff bound. Besides, holding onto Anibal Sanchez would've been a big mistake as we found out with his new contract terms.

Well, they never has plans with Anibal involved. Even if the team was gutted, he was the only sure bet to be dealt in July. I actually feel attendance wont be too bad. Half the fans didnt go for the team anyway, they went for the cool ballpark with good food and fun bars and those people will likely be back since some tickets are $3 on stubhub...

#15
Larry

Larry

    The Head Fish

  • Admin
  • 46,785 posts
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY
  • Gender:Male
Attendance was definitely not the reason for the mid-season deals. Trades were made because the front office (rightfully) decided that roster wasn't going to be playoff bound. Besides, holding onto Anibal Sanchez would've been a big mistake as we found out with his new contract terms.

Well, they never has plans with Anibal involved. Even if the team was gutted, he was the only sure bet to be dealt in July. I actually feel attendance wont be too bad. Half the fans didnt go for the team anyway, they went for the cool ballpark with good food and fun bars and those people will likely be back since some tickets are $3 on stubhub...

 

If they felt we would contend all of 2012, they would not have dealt Anibal.



#16
Wild Card

Wild Card

    Big Ears, Big Future

  • Members
  • 16,866 posts
  • Location:Coconut Creek, Florida
  • Gender:Male

Attendance was definitely not the reason for the mid-season deals. Trades were made because the front office (rightfully) decided that roster wasn't going to be playoff bound. Besides, holding onto Anibal Sanchez would've been a big mistake as we found out with his new contract terms.

Well, they never has plans with Anibal involved. Even if the team was gutted, he was the only sure bet to be dealt in July. I actually feel attendance wont be too bad. Half the fans didnt go for the team anyway, they went for the cool ballpark with good food and fun bars and those people will likely be back since some tickets are $3 on stubhub...

If they felt we would contend all of 2012, they would not have dealt Anibal.

Yes, if we were seriously in the hunt I agree completely. But even then they had zero intention of signing him long term after the season...

#17
Larry

Larry

    The Head Fish

  • Admin
  • 46,785 posts
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY
  • Gender:Male

 

Attendance was definitely not the reason for the mid-season deals. Trades were made because the front office (rightfully) decided that roster wasn't going to be playoff bound. Besides, holding onto Anibal Sanchez would've been a big mistake as we found out with his new contract terms.

Well, they never has plans with Anibal involved. Even if the team was gutted, he was the only sure bet to be dealt in July. I actually feel attendance wont be too bad. Half the fans didnt go for the team anyway, they went for the cool ballpark with good food and fun bars and those people will likely be back since some tickets are $3 on stubhub...

If they felt we would contend all of 2012, they would not have dealt Anibal.

Yes, if we were seriously in the hunt I agree completely. But even then they had zero intention of signing him long term after the season...

 

Right, of course not. 



#18
Wild Card

Wild Card

    Big Ears, Big Future

  • Members
  • 16,866 posts
  • Location:Coconut Creek, Florida
  • Gender:Male





Attendance was definitely not the reason for the mid-season deals. Trades were made because the front office (rightfully) decided that roster wasn't going to be playoff bound. Besides, holding onto Anibal Sanchez would've been a big mistake as we found out with his new contract terms.

Well, they never has plans with Anibal involved. Even if the team was gutted, he was the only sure bet to be dealt in July. I actually feel attendance wont be too bad. Half the fans didnt go for the team anyway, they went for the cool ballpark with good food and fun bars and those people will likely be back since some tickets are $3 on stubhub...
If they felt we would contend all of 2012, they would not have dealt Anibal.
Yes, if we were seriously in the hunt I agree completely. But even then they had zero intention of signing him long term after the season...
Right, of course not.
So, then we agree.

People agreeing on MB.com!?

Must be Christmas.

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

#19
Das Texan

Das Texan

    Classic.

  • Moderators
  • 17,440 posts
  • Location:San Antonio de Bejar
  • Gender:Male

My theory is that fans got pissed off that Ozzie was still around after his pro Castro comments.

 

 

so they said the hell with you.



#20
knglover

knglover

    Sun

  • Members
  • 787 posts
  • Gender:Male
My theory is that fans got pissed off that Ozzie was still around after his pro Castro comments.

 

 

so they said the hell with you.

 

But is it also safe to say that while they would have still been mad, the pain and anger from his comments would have been that much more soothed by a winning product on the field? Sorry I dont buy the arguement that since the team had 1 really fantyastic month that attendance should have gone up.



#21
squall

squall

    pwner

  • Supporter
  • 6,829 posts
  • Location:miami, fl
  • Gender:Male
Part Ozzie, part expensive tickets at first, but mostly Miami sports fans suck. Like 90%.

#22
DcFishFan

DcFishFan

    Zephyr

  • Members
  • 1,507 posts
  • Location:The Gables
  • Gender:Male
Agree with squall completely.

#23
knglover

knglover

    Sun

  • Members
  • 787 posts
  • Gender:Male
Part Ozzie, part expensive tickets at first, but mostly Miami sports fans suck. Like 90%.

 

btw...I am actually finding myself liking squall more and more these days.  Are you using a proxy service to post for you?



#24
Out of the Past

Out of the Past

    Rookie

  • Members
  • 4,324 posts
  • Gender:Male
Low attendance is part of the reason for the slash in payroll. Fans didn't show up in droves when the Marlins had a high payroll anyway.

Early on fans were showing-up but then attendance decreased because of the losing.



#25
Larry

Larry

    The Head Fish

  • Admin
  • 46,785 posts
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY
  • Gender:Male
Low attendance is part of the reason for the slash in payroll. Fans didn't show up in droves when the Marlins had a high payroll anyway.

Early on fans were showing-up but then attendance decreased because of the losing.

 

They really weren't showing up as much as people think.  Please see el penguino's post from earlier.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users